Why insurers and associations keep saying yes to InsureTechs

whats insurers and associations are saying about insuretech

Insurers and reinsurers have invested USD 15.3 billion into InsureTech deals over the past 13 years — about a quarter of all InsureTech funding globally, per Gallagher Re. That’s not charity. It’s insurers buying speed they can’t build in-house fast enough themselves.

Here’s the unglamorous truth about why this works: building claims automation, embedded distribution or fraud detection from scratch inside a 50-year-old insurer is slow, expensive, and usually three product cycles behind the InsureTech that’s been doing nothing else since it was founded. So insurers don’t build it — they date it, fund it, or buy it outright. Munich Re didn’t out-engineer Next Insurance; it acquired it for USD 2.6 billion and called it a strategic masterstroke. CyberCube, meanwhile, is basically the prom king of cyber risk analytics, picking up new dance partners (Aviva, DUAL, Mapfre Re) every season.

Associations get a quieter but equally good deal: curated InsureTech access means members see vetted innovation without each one running their own due diligence from zero. Less reinventing the wheel, more borrowing a really good one.

The pattern holds whether you’re an insurer chasing faster claims, or an association trying to look forward-thinking at the next AGM: someone else has already built the thing you were about to spend two years building badly.

Sources: Gallagher Re, Global InsurTech Report Q3 2025 (via Carrier Management) · CB Insights, State of Insurtech 2025 Report

Sharing is caring…

Register Your Interest

Tell us what you’re looking for.
We’ll be in touch within 3-5 business days.